PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAIDX vs. LAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett International Value Fund (LAIDX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAIDX achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than LAFFX's 13.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LAIDX has underperformed LAFFX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while LAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.


LAIDX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.21%
6M
8.51%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
32.36%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
9.53%
ALL TIME*
5.22%

LAFFX

1D
0.67%
1M
0.94%
6M
7.50%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAIDX
Lord Abbett International Value Fund
16.26%38.19%8.03%15.65%-10.62%9.90%4.19%17.90%-15.74%21.75%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
13.03%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LAIDX and LAFFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2008

0.76

The correlation between LAIDX and LAFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAIDX vs. LAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LAIDX
LAIDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LAIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LAIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett International Value Fund (LAIDX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAIDXLAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.01

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

12.64

-2.49

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAIDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the LAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAIDX and LAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAIDX drawdown since its inception was -52.40%, smaller than the maximum LAFFX drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAIDX and LAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAIDXLAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.40%

-60.50%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-7.59%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-15.38%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-19.50%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-39.59%

-2.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.31%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-8.99%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

1.81%

+1.54%

Volatility

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett International Value Fund (LAIDX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) at 2.51%. This indicates that LAIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAIDXLAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.51%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

8.39%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

10.82%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

14.51%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

17.39%

-0.70%

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAIDX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than LAFFX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAIDX vs. LAFFX - Dividend Comparison

LAIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than LAFFX's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.35%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%
LAIDX
Lord Abbett International Value Fund
1.92%2.75%3.55%3.31%4.00%3.49%2.31%3.25%3.67%3.04%3.94%3.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAIDX and LAFFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAIDX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to LAFFX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAIDX dropped -52.40% vs LAFFX's -60.50%.

LAIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAIDX and LAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer