PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAGWX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LAGWX

1D
0.03%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.21%
6M
26.95%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
14.84%

UMBHX

1D
0.29%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LAGWX and UMBHX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAGWX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGWX
LAGWX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LAGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAGWXUMBHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAGWXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

2.70

-2.20

Drawdowns

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGWX drawdown since its inception was -60.31%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGWX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAGWXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.31%

-1.86%

-58.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-0.63%

-16.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

Volatility

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAGWXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.52%

24.77%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.66%

24.77%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

24.77%

+2.47%

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGWX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAGWX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAGWX nor UMBHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAGWX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%12.60%9.67%22.87%33.87%0.00%0.00%10.03%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAGWX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAGWX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer