PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAGVX vs. VSCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than VSCSX's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX has outperformed VSCSX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while VSCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.73% annualized return.


LAGVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.85%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
2.93%

VSCSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.99%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
0.57%8.29%2.50%8.23%-16.34%1.39%7.98%12.96%-2.65%6.94%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.71%6.75%5.36%6.11%-5.72%-0.43%5.06%6.85%0.88%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGVX and VSCSX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2009

0.66

The correlation between LAGVX and VSCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAGVX vs. VSCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGVX
LAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCSX
VSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAGVXVSCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.55

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.44

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

13.75

-7.14

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VSCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGVX and VSCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAGVXVSCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.69

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.89

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

1.16

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.36

-0.63

Drawdowns

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, which is greater than VSCSX's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and VSCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAGVXVSCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-9.36%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-1.36%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-1.36%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-9.36%

-12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.70%

-9.36%

-12.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.26%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-0.98%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.34%

+0.76%

Volatility

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX) at 0.57%. This indicates that LAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAGVXVSCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

0.57%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

1.27%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.13%

1.75%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

2.71%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

2.37%

+3.58%

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGVX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCSX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAGVX vs. VSCSX - Dividend Comparison

LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than VSCSX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
5.40%5.44%4.57%4.48%3.15%4.81%3.46%3.85%4.27%3.49%3.94%4.70%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.42%4.32%4.27%3.07%1.98%1.78%2.25%2.85%2.66%2.26%1.93%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAGVX and VSCSX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAGVX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to VSCSX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGVX dropped -21.70% vs VSCSX's -9.36%.

VSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAGVX and VSCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer