PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAGVX vs. VICBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than VICBX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX has underperformed VICBX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while VICBX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.19% annualized return.


LAGVX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.20%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
2.88%

VICBX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
3.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
0.15%8.29%2.50%8.23%-16.34%1.39%7.98%12.96%-2.65%6.94%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.17%9.37%3.67%8.87%-14.06%-1.50%9.57%15.96%-1.72%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGVX and VICBX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.74

The correlation between LAGVX and VICBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAGVX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGVX
LAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VICBX
VICBX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VICBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VICBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAGVXVICBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.10

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

7.01

-1.23

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the VICBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGVX and VICBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAGVXVICBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.58

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.21

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.88

-0.14

Drawdowns

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and VICBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAGVXVICBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-20.55%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-2.95%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-5.98%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-20.55%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.70%

-20.55%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.35%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-3.14%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

0.88%

+0.23%

Volatility

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) at 1.37%. This indicates that LAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAGVXVICBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.37%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

2.87%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.13%

3.91%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

6.16%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

5.34%

+0.61%

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGVX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAGVX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison

LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than VICBX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
5.42%5.44%4.57%4.48%3.15%4.81%3.46%3.85%4.27%3.49%3.94%4.70%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.80%4.61%4.79%3.72%3.02%2.82%2.79%5.01%3.64%3.23%3.32%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAGVX and VICBX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAGVX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to VICBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGVX dropped -21.70% vs VICBX's -20.55%.

VICBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAGVX and VICBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer