LAGVX vs. VBF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LAGVX (Lord Abbett Income Fund) and VBF (Invesco Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX returned 2.93%/yr vs 2.94%/yr for VBF. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LAGVX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for VBF.

Performance

LAGVX vs. VBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than VBF's -0.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LAGVX having a 2.93% annualized return and VBF not far ahead at 2.94%.

LAGVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

VBF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: -1.57%
• 1Y: 2.21%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: -0.88%
• 10Y*: 2.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGVX vs. VBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund	0.57%	8.29%	2.50%	8.23%	-16.34%	1.39%	7.98%	12.96%	-2.65%	6.94%
VBF Invesco Bond Fund	-0.95%	5.46%	6.97%	2.27%	-17.77%	-5.37%	12.80%	30.91%	-11.16%	13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGVX and VBF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994	0.17

Over the past year, LAGVX and VBF have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

LAGVX vs. VBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGVX

LAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 28
LAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
LAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

VBF

VBF Risk / Return Rank: 5
VBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
VBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
VBF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
VBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
VBF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGVX vs. VBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAGVX	VBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.37	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	0.60	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.07	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	0.55	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	1.52	+5.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAGVX vs. VBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the VBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGVX and VBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAGVX	VBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	0.37	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.07	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.23	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.33	+0.40

Drawdowns

LAGVX vs. VBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, smaller than the maximum VBF drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and VBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAGVX	VBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.70%	-32.23%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.61%	-4.03%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.25%	-11.52%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-32.23%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.70%	-32.23%	+10.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-11.75%	+10.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-7.25%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.46%	-0.36%

Volatility

LAGVX vs. VBF - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) at 1.74%. This indicates that LAGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAGVX	VBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	1.74%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.77%	4.54%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.13%	6.05%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	12.38%	-5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	12.73%	-6.78%

LAGVX vs. VBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAGVX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VBF's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAGVX vs. VBF - Dividend Comparison

LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, less than VBF's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAGVX Lord Abbett Income Fund	5.40%	5.44%	4.57%	4.48%	3.15%	4.81%	3.46%	3.85%	4.27%	3.49%	3.94%	4.70%
VBF Invesco Bond Fund	5.54%	5.46%	5.51%	5.31%	4.60%	3.36%	6.89%	5.04%	5.40%	5.07%	4.56%	5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAGVX and VBF in my portfolio?

LAGVX and VBF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAGVX or VBF?

LAGVX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to VBF (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGVX dropped -21.70% vs VBF's -32.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.