PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAGVX vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAGVX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than AGNC's 4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LAGVX has underperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 2.85%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.53% annualized return.


LAGVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.85%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
2.85%

AGNC

1D
1.24%
1M
2.99%
YTD
4.71%
6M
4.71%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
0.15%8.29%2.50%8.23%-16.34%1.39%7.98%12.96%-2.65%6.94%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
4.71%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LAGVX and AGNC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008

0.17

Over the past year, LAGVX and AGNC have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAGVX vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAGVX
LAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAGVXAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.74

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

4.89

-0.15

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAGVX and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAGVX drawdown since its inception was -21.70%, smaller than the maximum AGNC drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAGVX and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAGVXAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.70%

-54.56%

+32.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.61%

-18.71%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-31.04%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-50.65%

+28.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.70%

-54.56%

+32.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-7.76%

+6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-13.55%

+9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

6.64%

-5.48%

Volatility

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Income Fund (LAGVX) is 1.34%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that LAGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAGVXAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

5.16%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

16.14%

-12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

19.57%

-14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

25.74%

-19.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.96%

25.41%

-19.45%

Dividends

LAGVX vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

LAGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than AGNC's 13.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.56%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
LAGVX
Lord Abbett Income Fund
5.42%5.44%4.57%4.48%3.15%4.81%3.46%3.85%4.27%3.49%3.94%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAGVX and AGNC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNC has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to LAGVX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAGVX dropped -21.70% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAGVX and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer