PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAFFX vs. LADYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAFFX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than LADYX's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX has underperformed LADYX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while LADYX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.


LAFFX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.53%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.55%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
10.75%

LADYX

1D
0.93%
1M
10.50%
YTD
31.32%
6M
28.85%
1Y
61.46%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
15.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
9.14%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
31.32%14.64%22.21%8.74%-35.92%-2.50%72.82%31.89%4.89%30.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LAFFX and LADYX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

0.74

The correlation between LAFFX and LADYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAFFX vs. LADYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LADYX
LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAFFXLADYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.32

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

16.07

-3.82

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the LADYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAFFX and LADYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAFFXLADYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.39

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.18

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.56

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.39

+0.06

Drawdowns

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAFFX drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LADYX drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAFFX and LADYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAFFXLADYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-60.18%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-14.67%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-32.06%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-50.98%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.59%

-54.05%

+14.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-20.14%

+11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.93%

-2.12%

Volatility

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) is 2.90%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that LAFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LADYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAFFXLADYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

9.55%

-6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

21.54%

-13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

26.55%

-16.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

27.67%

-13.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

27.23%

-9.78%

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAFFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LADYX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAFFX vs. LADYX - Dividend Comparison

LAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, while LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%9.60%7.58%18.36%28.34%0.00%0.00%8.82%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.59%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAFFX and LADYX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LADYX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to LAFFX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAFFX dropped -60.50% vs LADYX's -60.18%.

LADYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAFFX and LADYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer