PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LADYX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADYX achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than LBNDX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LADYX has outperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 15.15%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


LADYX

1D
0.93%
1M
10.50%
YTD
31.32%
6M
28.85%
1Y
61.46%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
15.15%

LBNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.99%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
31.32%14.64%22.21%8.74%-35.92%-2.50%72.82%31.89%4.89%30.27%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
1.63%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LADYX and LBNDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

0.55

The correlation between LADYX and LBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LADYX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADYX
LADYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LADYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LADYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LADYXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

2.12

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.07

8.69

+7.38

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADYX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LADYXLBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.14

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.36

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.10

-0.71

Drawdowns

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADYX drawdown since its inception was -60.18%, which is greater than LBNDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADYX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LADYXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.18%

-26.67%

-33.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.67%

-4.08%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.06%

-4.51%

-27.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.98%

-17.33%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.05%

-19.77%

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.36%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-3.52%

-16.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

0.99%

+2.94%

Volatility

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I (LADYX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) at 1.17%. This indicates that LADYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LADYXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

1.17%

+8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

3.14%

+18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

4.05%

+22.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

4.69%

+22.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.23%

5.04%

+22.19%

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LADYX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LADYX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LADYX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADYX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%9.60%7.58%18.36%28.34%0.00%0.00%8.82%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
6.04%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LADYX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LADYX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to LBNDX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LADYX dropped -60.18% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LADYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LADYX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer