LACG vs. KORU
LACG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF) and KORU (Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LACG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while KORU is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index. LACG is actively managed, while KORU is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LACG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for KORU.
Performance
LACG vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LACG achieves a -60.21% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 206.79% return.
LACG
- 1D
- -13.88%
- 1M
- -45.21%
- 6M
- -73.53%
- YTD
- -60.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -33.85%
- 6M
- 122.37%
- YTD
- 206.79%
- 1Y
- 581.75%
- 3Y*
- 83.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
LACG vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF | -60.21% | -27.29% |
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 206.79% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LACG and KORU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LACG vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
LACG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KORU
LACG vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LACG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LACG vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LACG drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LACG and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LACG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | -95.79% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -61.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.18% | -55.96% | -25.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.06% | -57.38% | +10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.48% | — |
Volatility
LACG vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LACG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 73.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 142.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.71% | 147.64% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.71% | 92.78% | +54.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.71% | 83.70% | +64.01% |
LACG vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LACG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
LACG vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
LACG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.28% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LACG and KORU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LACG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LACG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.
KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for LACG.
LACG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KORU is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LACG and 1.32% for KORU.
Find the right allocation for LACG and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer