LABU vs. TERG
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG).
LABU and TERG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LABU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). It was launched on May 28, 2015. TERG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025.
Performance
LABU vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LABU vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 4.20% | 17.81% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 102.79% | 28.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 102.79% return.
LABU
- 1D
- 22.31%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 78.34%
- 1Y
- 175.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- -36.38%
- 10Y*
- -11.81%
TERG
- 1D
- 14.40%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- 102.79%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LABU vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
TERG
LABU vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LABU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LABU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 10.56 | -10.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and TERG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LABU vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LABU vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and TERG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -39.32% | -59.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.33% | -30.58% | -65.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.45% | -9.77% | -71.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility
LABU vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.36% | 124.59% | -37.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.74% | 124.59% | -28.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.91% | 124.59% | -28.68% |