PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. TERG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LABU vs. TERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LABU vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 102.79% return.


LABU

1D
22.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
4.20%
6M
78.34%
1Y
175.22%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
-36.38%
10Y*
-11.81%

TERG

1D
14.40%
1M
-19.76%
YTD
102.79%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LABU vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TERG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUTERGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.90

LABU vs. TERG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUTERGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

10.56

-10.80

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and TERG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LABU vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
TERG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LABU vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and TERG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUTERGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-39.32%

-59.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.33%

-30.58%

-65.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.45%

-9.77%

-71.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.01%

Volatility

LABU vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LABUTERGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.36%

124.59%

-37.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.74%

124.59%

-28.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.91%

124.59%

-28.68%