PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABU vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 42.67% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 48.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of -12.33%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 45.88% annualized return.


LABU

1D
-8.60%
1M
-25.06%
6M
37.10%
YTD
42.67%
1Y
272.05%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
-26.71%
10Y*
-12.33%
ALL TIME*
-20.62%

TECL

1D
-0.52%
1M
-11.12%
6M
50.64%
YTD
48.00%
1Y
91.25%
3Y*
47.81%
5Y*
24.87%
10Y*
45.88%
ALL TIME*
46.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$76.19M$116.75M$118.31M
$140.43M$155.29M$226.00M

LABU vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
42.67%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
48.00%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and TECL is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.51

The correlation between LABU and TECL shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LABU vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LABU
TECL

Healthcare

99.5%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

99.2%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

LABU
99.5%
TECL

-

Financial Services

LABU
0.5%
TECL

-

Basic Materials

LABU
0.0%
TECL

-

Communication Services

LABU

-

TECL
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LABU

-

TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

LABU

-

TECL

-

Energy

LABU

-

TECL
0.0%

Industrials

LABU

-

TECL
0.0%

Real Estate

LABU

-

TECL

-

Technology

LABU

-

TECL
99.2%

Utilities

LABU

-

TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LABU vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LABUTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.00

1.71

+7.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.05

4.07

+18.98

LABU vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LABU vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-77.96%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-46.58%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-66.58%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.36%

-77.96%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-77.96%

-21.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.97%

-36.44%

-58.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-18.45%

-63.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.97%

19.52%

-7.55%

Volatility

LABU vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) is 24.69%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 28.17%. This indicates that LABU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABUTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.69%

28.17%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.73%

65.35%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.28%

76.26%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.01%

76.62%

+19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.22%

73.57%

+21.65%

LABU vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABU vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than TECL's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.45%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
4.81%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABU and TECL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (28.17%) compared to LABU (24.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 45.88% vs -12.33% for LABU. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, LABU has been the lower-risk option at 24.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 45.88% return vs -12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.45% for LABU.

LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.96% for LABU and 0.91% for TECL.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABU and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer