LABU vs. SPXS
LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LABU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LABU returned -13.53%/yr vs -42.01%/yr for SPXS. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
LABU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -25.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has outperformed SPXS with an annualized return of -13.53%, while SPXS has yielded a comparatively lower -42.01% annualized return.
LABU
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -11.09%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 195.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.82%
- 5Y*
- -32.76%
- 10Y*
- -13.53%
SPXS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -25.49%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -48.73%
- 3Y*
- -42.68%
- 5Y*
- -34.76%
- 10Y*
- -42.01%
LABU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 3.80% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -25.49% | -41.53% | -42.84% | -45.97% | 36.14% | -58.11% | -70.47% | -56.40% | 3.44% | -44.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and SPXS is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -0.57 |
The correlation between LABU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
SPXS
LABU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LABU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | -1.38 | +3.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | -2.31 | +5.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.75 | +0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | -0.96 | +7.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.77 | -1.62 | +20.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LABU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | -1.38 | +3.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.69 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | -0.79 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.83 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
LABU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -100.00% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -50.77% | +20.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.30% | -84.13% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.59% | -90.11% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | -99.63% | +0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.34% | -100.00% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -96.30% | +14.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 30.04% | -19.56% |
Volatility
LABU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 27.83% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.51%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.83% | 8.51% | +19.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.70% | 26.82% | +32.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.91% | 35.54% | +40.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.58% | 50.39% | +45.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.42% | 53.54% | +41.88% |
LABU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.91% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (27.83%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, LABU leads with -13.53% vs -42.01% for SPXS. On fees, SPXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LABU has performed better with a -13.53% return vs -42.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.74% for LABU.
LABU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 1.08% for SPXS.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABU and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer