PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LABU vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LABU vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
4.20%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
-3.54%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's -3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has underperformed QQQE with an annualized return of -11.81%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.


LABU

1D
22.31%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
4.20%
6M
78.34%
1Y
175.22%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
-36.38%
10Y*
-11.81%

QQQE

1D
2.57%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-3.54%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LABU vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUQQQEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

0.67

+1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

1.11

+1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.08

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.90

4.38

+7.52

LABU vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and QQQE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.67

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.31

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.64

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.68

-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and QQQE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LABU vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQQE's 0.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.64%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Drawdowns

LABU vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and QQQE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-32.14%

-67.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

-12.74%

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.75%

-32.14%

-65.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-32.14%

-66.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.33%

-7.08%

-89.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.45%

-5.22%

-76.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.01%

3.13%

+8.88%

Volatility

LABU vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 33.99% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 5.68%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LABUQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.99%

5.68%

+28.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.88%

11.03%

+45.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.36%

20.46%

+66.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.74%

20.33%

+75.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.91%

20.71%

+75.20%