LABU vs. NVDA
LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LABU returned -11.11%/yr vs 67.95%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LABU vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -11.11%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.
LABU
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 207.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- -34.35%
- 10Y*
- -11.11%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -8.83%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
LABU vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 12.06% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and NVDA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LABU and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
NVDA
LABU vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.49 | 2.07 | +4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.31 | 4.94 | +13.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABU vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -89.72% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -20.21% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.30% | -36.88% | -41.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.59% | -66.34% | -31.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | -66.34% | -32.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.05% | -12.86% | -83.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.69% | -36.18% | -45.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 8.46% | +2.45% |
Volatility
LABU vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 31.31% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 13.26%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.31% | 13.26% | +18.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.52% | 26.67% | +34.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.69% | 35.00% | +42.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.70% | 51.76% | +43.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.45% | 49.84% | +45.61% |
Dividends
LABU vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.69% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABU and NVDA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (31.31%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABU and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer