LABU vs. NTSD
LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LABU is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
LABU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LABU
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 34.26%
- YTD
- 47.57%
- 6M
- 36.98%
- 1Y
- 324.35%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- -31.01%
- 10Y*
- -7.18%
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LABU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 60.95% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and NTSD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LABU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -5.58% | -93.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.80% | -2.97% | -91.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.72% | -1.09% | -80.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | — | — |
Volatility
LABU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.78% | 25.11% | +53.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.94% | 25.11% | +70.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.44% | 25.11% | +70.33% |
LABU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.52% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for LABU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer