PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABU vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of -10.06%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.08% annualized return.


LABU

1D
5.55%
1M
9.25%
YTD
18.28%
6M
15.83%
1Y
224.16%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
-32.95%
10Y*
-10.06%

NFLX

1D
1.66%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-12.89%
6M
-12.90%
1Y
-32.62%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
24.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
18.28%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-12.89%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and NFLX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.37

The correlation between LABU and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LABUNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.35

-0.76

+8.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.69

-1.29

+21.98

LABU vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LABU vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-81.99%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-43.35%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-43.35%

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.59%

-75.95%

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-75.95%

-23.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.83%

-39.01%

-56.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.69%

-24.91%

-56.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.89%

25.31%

-14.42%

Volatility

LABU vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 31.78% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 6.19%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABUNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.78%

6.19%

+25.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.71%

24.59%

+37.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.92%

33.16%

+44.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.71%

43.10%

+52.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.50%

41.51%

+53.99%

Dividends

LABU vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.65%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABU and NFLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (31.78%) compared to NFLX (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABU and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer