LABU vs. GEVG
LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and GEVG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LABU is passively managed, while GEVG is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABU charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEVG.
Performance
LABU vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 59.86% return, which is significantly lower than GEVG's 106.82% return.
LABU
- 1D
- -8.20%
- 1M
- 38.01%
- 6M
- 52.81%
- YTD
- 59.86%
- 1Y
- 286.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.50%
- 5Y*
- -26.07%
- 10Y*
- -9.00%
GEVG
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 117.21%
- YTD
- 106.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LABU vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 59.86% | -2.08% |
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 106.82% | -11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and GEVG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. GEVG — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
GEVG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LABU vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABU vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -45.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and GEVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -45.50% | -53.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.37% | -25.95% | -68.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -12.01% | -69.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | — | — |
Volatility
LABU vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | GEVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.41% | 102.65% | -23.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.05% | 102.65% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.22% | 102.65% | -7.43% |
LABU vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABU vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while GEVG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEVG Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.40% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABU and GEVG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for GEVG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for LABU and 0.75% for GEVG.
Find the right allocation for LABU and GEVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer