PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. FAZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABU vs. FAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than FAZ's 22.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has outperformed FAZ with an annualized return of -13.53%, while FAZ has yielded a comparatively lower -42.81% annualized return.


LABU

1D
4.61%
1M
-11.09%
YTD
3.80%
6M
3.63%
1Y
195.85%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
-32.76%
10Y*
-13.53%

FAZ

1D
3.45%
1M
5.24%
YTD
22.66%
6M
14.22%
1Y
0.55%
3Y*
-36.72%
5Y*
-26.05%
10Y*
-42.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. FAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
3.80%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
22.66%-37.21%-51.01%-26.67%1.16%-67.05%-73.90%-58.62%16.84%-46.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and FAZ is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. FAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FAZ
FAZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. FAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUFAZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

0.01

+2.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

0.34

+2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.04

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

0.02

+6.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.77

0.03

+18.73

LABU vs. FAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the FAZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and FAZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUFAZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

0.01

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

-0.47

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

-0.69

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.72

+0.48

Drawdowns

LABU vs. FAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FAZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and FAZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUFAZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-100.00%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-30.20%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-83.61%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.59%

-87.53%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-99.78%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.34%

-100.00%

+3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.68%

-99.14%

+17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

16.58%

-6.10%

Volatility

LABU vs. FAZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 27.83% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) at 9.30%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABUFAZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.83%

9.30%

+18.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.70%

32.18%

+27.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.91%

43.09%

+32.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.58%

55.83%

+39.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.42%

62.07%

+33.35%

LABU vs. FAZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FAZ's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABU vs. FAZ - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than FAZ's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
2.77%5.07%7.34%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.63%0.56%0.00%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.74%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABU and FAZ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (27.83%) compared to FAZ (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs FAZ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, LABU leads with -13.53% vs -42.81% for FAZ. On fees, FAZ is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, FAZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, LABU has performed better with a -13.53% return vs -42.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAZ is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

FAZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.74% for LABU.

LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while FAZ tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 1.07% for FAZ.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABU and FAZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer