PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. FAZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LABU vs. FAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LABU vs. FAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
6.42%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
32.56%-37.21%-51.01%-26.67%1.16%-67.05%-73.90%-58.62%16.84%-46.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than FAZ's 32.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has outperformed FAZ with an annualized return of -11.62%, while FAZ has yielded a comparatively lower -43.12% annualized return.


LABU

1D
2.13%
1M
0.08%
YTD
6.42%
6M
75.49%
1Y
215.44%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
-36.11%
10Y*
-11.62%

FAZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
10.20%
YTD
32.56%
6M
22.85%
1Y
-8.19%
3Y*
-36.28%
5Y*
-29.67%
10Y*
-43.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LABU vs. FAZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FAZ's 1.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. FAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FAZ
FAZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. FAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUFAZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

-0.14

+2.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

0.22

+2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.03

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

-0.14

+5.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.35

-0.18

+15.53

LABU vs. FAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FAZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and FAZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUFAZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

-0.14

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.53

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

-0.70

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.72

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and FAZ is -0.45. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

LABU vs. FAZ - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than FAZ's 2.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.73%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
FAZ
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
2.57%5.07%7.34%4.88%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.63%0.56%0.00%

Drawdowns

LABU vs. FAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FAZ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and FAZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUFAZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-100.00%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.66%

-54.53%

+17.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.75%

-88.14%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-99.78%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.25%

-100.00%

+3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.45%

-99.13%

+17.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.80%

42.05%

-30.25%

Volatility

LABU vs. FAZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 33.08% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) at 13.97%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LABUFAZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.08%

13.97%

+19.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.88%

33.72%

+23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.51%

58.17%

+28.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.74%

56.08%

+39.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.89%

62.12%

+33.77%