LAB vs. XLK

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LAB (Standard Biotools Inc) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 3 years, LAB returned -29.81%/yr vs 26.04%/yr for XLK. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LAB vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standard Biotools Inc (LAB) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAB achieves a -32.19% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.09% return.

LAB

• 1D: -3.27%
• 1M: -4.92%
• 6M: -38.00%
• YTD: -32.19%
• 1Y: -33.23%
• 3Y*: -29.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -29.99%

XLK

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.90%
• 6M: 22.17%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 26.04%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 23.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LAB Standard Biotools Inc	$1.80M	$2.13M	$3.13M
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.61B	$1.67B	$2.22B

LAB vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LAB Standard Biotools Inc	-32.19%	-26.86%	-20.81%	88.89%	-71.11%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.09%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-22.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LAB and XLK is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.28

Return for Risk

LAB vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LAB

LAB Risk / Return Rank: 22
LAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
LAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LAB Omega Ratio Rank: 24
LAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
LAB Martin Ratio Rank: 18

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 55
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LAB vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standard Biotools Inc (LAB) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAB	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.34	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	1.85	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.23	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	2.16	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	5.85	-6.98

LAB vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAB and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAB vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAB drawdown since its inception was -81.87%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAB and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAB	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.87%	-82.05%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.30%	-15.92%	-40.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.93%	-25.66%	-50.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.57%	-11.43%	-67.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.09%	-34.80%	-22.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.94%	5.86%	+25.08%

Volatility

LAB vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Standard Biotools Inc (LAB) has a higher volatility of 23.09% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.58%. This indicates that LAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAB	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.09%	9.58%	+13.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.23%	21.81%	+34.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.08%	25.59%	+43.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.11%	25.75%	+56.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.11%	24.90%	+57.21%

Dividends

LAB vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

LAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAB Standard Biotools Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAB and XLK in my portfolio?

LAB and XLK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAB or XLK?

LAB has higher volatility (23.09%) compared to XLK (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAB dropped -81.87% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.