L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE
L4K3.DE (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc) and MCHN.DE (Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - L4K3.DE tracks the MSCI China while MCHN.DE tracks the MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, L4K3.DE returned -4.21%/yr vs -2.88%/yr for MCHN.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. L4K3.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MCHN.DE.
Performance
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, L4K3.DE achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly lower than MCHN.DE's -1.78% return.
L4K3.DE
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -3.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- -4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MCHN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 8.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.88%
- 10Y*
- —
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L4K3.DE Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc | -9.66% | 17.16% | 27.31% | -14.42% | -14.92% | -22.08% |
MCHN.DE Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc | -1.78% | 13.01% | 25.16% | -15.29% | -18.40% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between L4K3.DE and MCHN.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between L4K3.DE and MCHN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
L4K3.DE
MCHN.DE
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) and Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| L4K3.DE | MCHN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.75 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 1.51 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L4K3.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than MCHN.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L4K3.DE and MCHN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L4K3.DE | MCHN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -45.79% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -11.21% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -23.24% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.99% | -43.29% | -2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.51% | -17.50% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -23.92% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.18% | 5.54% | +4.64% |
Volatility
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF Acc (L4K3.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) at 5.28%. This indicates that L4K3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L4K3.DE | MCHN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 5.28% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 12.32% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 17.52% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 25.04% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 24.64% | +2.29% |
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
L4K3.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
L4K3.DE vs. MCHN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither L4K3.DE nor MCHN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, L4K3.DE and MCHN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, L4K3.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
L4K3.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MCHN.DE.
L4K3.DE tracks MSCI China, while MCHN.DE tracks MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for L4K3.DE and 0.35% for MCHN.DE.
Find the right allocation for L4K3.DE and MCHN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer