PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L100.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


L100.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.81%
YTD
6.14%
6M
8.45%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
9.00%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
6.14%25.82%9.29%7.37%4.86%17.92%-11.79%17.40%-9.14%6.51%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between L100.L and MWRD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.60

The correlation between L100.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
L100.L
MWRD.L

Financial Services

24.5%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
6.7%

Industrials

13.7%
10.6%

Healthcare

13.6%
12.4%

Energy

11.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.8%

Utilities

5.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
10.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.4%

Technology

0.8%
24.7%

Financial Services

L100.L
24.5%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

L100.L
13.9%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Industrials

L100.L
13.7%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Healthcare

L100.L
13.6%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Energy

L100.L
11.7%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

L100.L
8.5%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Utilities

L100.L
5.3%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

L100.L
4.7%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Communication Services

L100.L
2.6%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Real Estate

L100.L
0.9%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Technology

L100.L
0.8%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L100.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L100.L
L100.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
L100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
L100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
L100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


L100.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


L100.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L100.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

Volatility

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L100.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

L100.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither L100.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


L100.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for L100.L.

L100.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L100.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer