L100.L vs. LCUK.L
L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, L100.L returned 11.80%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for LCUK.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. L100.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.
Performance
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
L100.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with L100.L having a 6.14% return and LCUK.L slightly lower at 5.93%.
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 6.14% | 25.82% | 9.29% | 7.37% | 4.86% | 17.92% | -11.79% | 17.40% | -0.27% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | -11.83% | 18.73% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between L100.L and LCUK.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between L100.L and LCUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
L100.L
LCUK.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
L100.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Defensive
L100.L
LCUK.L
Industrials
L100.L
LCUK.L
Healthcare
L100.L
LCUK.L
Energy
L100.L
LCUK.L
Basic Materials
L100.L
LCUK.L
Utilities
L100.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
L100.L
LCUK.L
Communication Services
L100.L
LCUK.L
Real Estate
L100.L
LCUK.L
Technology
L100.L
LCUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
L100.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
L100.L
LCUK.L
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| L100.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.80 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 5.79 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| L100.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.38 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.77 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.51 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum L100.L drawdown since its inception was -44.41%, which is greater than LCUK.L's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L100.L and LCUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| L100.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.41% | -35.54% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -9.13% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.01% | -12.65% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.01% | -12.65% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -3.98% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -4.97% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.85% | -0.24% |
Volatility
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) have volatilities of 3.93% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| L100.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.76% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 10.20% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 11.92% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 12.97% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 15.69% | -0.57% |
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
L100.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
L100.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither L100.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, L100.L and LCUK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for L100.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for L100.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.
Find the right allocation for L100.L and LCUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer