PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KYN vs. RSNYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KYN vs. RSNYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund Class Y (RSNYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYN achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than RSNYX's 34.31% return. Over the past 10 years, KYN has underperformed RSNYX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while RSNYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.


KYN

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
14.87%
6M
18.51%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
20.04%
10Y*
6.56%

RSNYX

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
34.31%
6M
32.22%
1Y
93.95%
3Y*
33.94%
5Y*
29.97%
10Y*
13.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KYN vs. RSNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
14.87%5.34%60.45%13.19%20.50%44.21%-51.60%11.52%-19.35%7.33%
RSNYX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund Class Y
34.31%70.14%16.28%-8.32%35.48%83.62%27.86%-24.32%-45.63%1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between KYN and RSNYX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between KYN and RSNYX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KYN vs. RSNYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KYN
KYN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
KYN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
KYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
KYN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RSNYX
RSNYX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RSNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RSNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KYN vs. RSNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund Class Y (RSNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KYNRSNYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.65

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

8.18

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

26.51

-20.32

KYN vs. RSNYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KYN Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the RSNYX Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KYN and RSNYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KYN vs. RSNYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYN drawdown since its inception was -91.43%, roughly equal to the maximum RSNYX drawdown of -89.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYN and RSNYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KYNRSNYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.43%

-89.31%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-11.65%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-25.28%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-25.28%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.74%

-84.10%

-3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-3.33%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.90%

-32.21%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.59%

-0.29%

Volatility

KYN vs. RSNYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) is 5.22%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund Class Y (RSNYX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that KYN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KYNRSNYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

7.05%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

17.10%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

23.21%

-6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

24.91%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.85%

31.46%

+9.39%

KYN vs. RSNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KYN has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RSNYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

KYN vs. RSNYX - Dividend Comparison

KYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than RSNYX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
7.23%7.75%8.34%9.45%9.05%6.42%16.17%10.34%14.17%9.97%11.24%15.20%
RSNYX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund Class Y
3.27%4.39%1.89%2.67%1.07%0.04%0.26%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KYN and RSNYX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSNYX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to KYN (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KYN dropped -91.43% vs RSNYX's -89.31%.

RSNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KYN and RSNYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer