PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KYCCF vs. ETN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KYCCF vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Keyence Corp (KYCCF) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KYCCF achieves a 39.44% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 33.02% return. Over the past 10 years, KYCCF has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 5.07%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.08% annualized return.


KYCCF

1D
1.96%
1M
3.48%
YTD
39.44%
6M
49.86%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
0.29%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
5.07%

ETN

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
33.02%
6M
26.26%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
25.16%
10Y*
24.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KYCCF vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KYCCF
Keyence Corp
39.44%-10.38%-6.64%11.82%-38.02%11.74%59.79%44.23%-11.26%-17.84%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
33.02%-2.79%39.51%56.22%-7.18%46.70%29.88%42.76%-10.04%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KYCCF and ETN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KYCCF:

$121.75B

ETN:

$163.93B

EPS

KYCCF:

$1.85K

ETN:

$10.22

PE Ratio

KYCCF:

0.27

ETN:

41.19

PEG Ratio

KYCCF:

0.03

ETN:

2.24

PS Ratio

KYCCF:

0.10

ETN:

5.76

PB Ratio

KYCCF:

0.03

ETN:

8.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

KYCCF:

$1.18T

ETN:

$28.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KYCCF:

$976.07B

ETN:

$7.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

KYCCF:

$508.44B

ETN:

$4.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KYCCF vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KYCCF
KYCCF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
KYCCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KYCCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
KYCCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
KYCCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KYCCF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KYCCF vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keyence Corp (KYCCF) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KYCCFETNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

0.97

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

1.45

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.61

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.47

3.53

-2.06

KYCCF vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KYCCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KYCCF and ETN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KYCCFETNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

0.97

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.85

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.81

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.42

-0.24

Drawdowns

KYCCF vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KYCCF drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYCCF and ETN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KYCCFETNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-68.95%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.47%

-19.14%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.49%

-34.46%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.72%

-34.46%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.72%

-44.55%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.07%

-2.46%

-23.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.73%

-14.90%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.15%

8.75%

+3.40%

Volatility

KYCCF vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Keyence Corp (KYCCF) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) have volatilities of 12.90% and 12.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KYCCFETNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.90%

12.77%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.48%

25.11%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.76%

32.08%

+11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.50%

29.93%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.02%

29.96%

+6.06%

Dividends

KYCCF vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

KYCCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than ETN's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.02%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
KYCCF
Keyence Corp
0.24%0.98%0.51%0.49%0.39%0.29%0.33%0.25%0.18%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KYCCF vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Keyence Corp and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B20222023202420252026
336.79B
7.45B
(KYCCF) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KYCCF vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Keyence Corp and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
83.5%
0
Portfolio components
KYCCF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Keyence Corp reported a gross profit of 281.08B and revenue of 336.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KYCCF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Keyence Corp reported an operating income of 180.51B and revenue of 336.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 53.6%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

KYCCF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Keyence Corp reported a net income of 134.86B and revenue of 336.79B, resulting in a net margin of 40.0%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KYCCF and ETN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KYCCF has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to ETN (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KYCCF dropped -53.72% vs ETN's -68.95%.

ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KYCCF and ETN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer