KWT vs. COMT
KWT (iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KWT is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Kuwait Select Size Liquidity Capped Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. KWT is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KWT returned 9.17%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for COMT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
KWT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWT achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
KWT
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
KWT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | -1.30% | 25.38% | 11.29% | -4.71% | 5.16% | 30.73% | 9.07% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWT and COMT is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.08 |
The correlation between KWT and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KWT vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KWT
COMT
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
KWT
COMT
Real Estate
KWT
COMT
-
Industrials
KWT
COMT
-
Communication Services
KWT
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
KWT
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
KWT
COMT
-
Basic Materials
KWT
COMT
-
Utilities
KWT
COMT
-
Energy
KWT
-
COMT
-
Healthcare
KWT
-
COMT
-
Technology
KWT
-
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
KWT
COMT
KWT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KWT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 5.95 | -5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 14.11 | -12.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KWT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.24 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.20 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
KWT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWT drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWT and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -51.89% | +27.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -8.02% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -13.31% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -29.00% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.07% | -4.82% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.30% | -24.07% | +16.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 3.38% | +1.47% |
Volatility
KWT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF (KWT) is 3.16%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that KWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 7.37% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 18.80% | -7.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 21.29% | -7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 21.06% | -7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 18.89% | -4.96% |
KWT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
KWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
KWT iShares MSCI Kuwait ETF | 5.47% | 5.40% | 6.09% | 2.25% | 5.87% | 7.65% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWT and COMT have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to KWT (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWT dropped -24.37% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 9.17% for KWT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, KWT has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KWT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 5.47% for KWT.
KWT is categorized as Financials Equities, while COMT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KWT and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KWT and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer