KWEB vs. KWBE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR (KWBE.L).

KWEB and KWBE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. KWBE.L is a passively managed fund by Waystone Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 30, 2020. Both KWEB and KWBE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR (KWBE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-16.89%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	12.83%
KWBE.L KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR	-17.12%	25.74%	12.86%	-10.45%	-17.32%	-47.47%	11.98%

Different Trading Currencies

KWEB is traded in USD, while KWBE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the KWBE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KWEB having a -16.89% return and KWBE.L slightly lower at -17.12%.

KWEB

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: -16.89%
• 6M: -29.25%
• 1Y: -14.27%
• 3Y*: 0.43%
• 5Y*: -15.48%
• 10Y*: -0.00%

KWBE.L

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -3.60%
• YTD: -17.12%
• 6M: -29.92%
• 1Y: -13.69%
• 3Y*: 0.50%
• 5Y*: -14.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than KWBE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWBE.L

KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR

Return for Risk

KWEB vs. KWBE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3

KWBE.L

KWBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
KWBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KWBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
KWBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2
KWBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
KWBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR (KWBE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KWEB	KWBE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	-0.50	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	-0.56	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.93	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	-0.44	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	-1.12	-0.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the KWBE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWEB and KWBE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KWEB	KWBE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	-0.50	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	-0.31	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.26	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and KWBE.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, while KWBE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.41%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%
KWBE.L KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, roughly equal to the maximum KWBE.L drawdown of -80.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and KWBE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KWEB	KWBE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.92%	-76.64%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	-30.06%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.23%	-70.40%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.27%	-65.26%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.81%	-59.68%	+24.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.20%	12.26%	-0.06%

Volatility

KWEB vs. KWBE.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF EUR (KWBE.L) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KWEB	KWBE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	8.83%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.06%	17.49%	+1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.53%	28.41%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.62%	47.03%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.87%	47.46%	-7.59%