KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L
KWE3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities) and MSTI.L (IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - KWE3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while MSTI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWE3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MSTI.L.
Performance
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KWE3.L having a -57.87% return and MSTI.L slightly higher at -55.10%.
KWE3.L
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -57.87%
- 6M
- -62.55%
- 1Y
- -59.44%
- 3Y*
- -34.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTI.L
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -36.16%
- YTD
- -55.10%
- 6M
- -60.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWE3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities | -57.87% | -3.34% |
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP | -55.10% | -61.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWE3.L and MSTI.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
KWE3.L
MSTI.L
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KWE3.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KWE3.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -1.36 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWE3.L drawdown since its inception was -98.72%, which is greater than MSTI.L's maximum drawdown of -85.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWE3.L and MSTI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWE3.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.72% | -85.28% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.63% | -85.28% | -13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.36% | -52.74% | -37.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.53% | — | — |
Volatility
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWE3.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.73% | 62.48% | +18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.42% | 62.48% | +73.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.42% | 62.48% | +73.94% |
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWE3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWE3.L vs. MSTI.L - Dividend Comparison
KWE3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KWE3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP | 1.50% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWE3.L and MSTI.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWE3.L.
KWE3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KWE3.L and 0.55% for MSTI.L.
Find the right allocation for KWE3.L and MSTI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer