KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

KWE3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities) and FLXC.L (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds. KWE3.L is actively managed, while FLXC.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KWE3.L returned -40.96%/yr vs 8.62%/yr for FLXC.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KWE3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.L.

Performance

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWE3.L achieves a -60.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLXC.L's -8.35% return.

KWE3.L

• 1D: 10.62%
• 1M: 2.18%
• 6M: -67.46%
• YTD: -60.11%
• 1Y: -64.29%
• 3Y*: -40.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLXC.L

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -1.33%
• 6M: -12.83%
• YTD: -8.35%
• 1Y: 0.10%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: -4.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KWE3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities	-60.11%	11.51%	-22.87%	-61.90%	-87.79%	-34.30%
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF	-8.35%	32.15%	19.39%	-12.76%	-23.03%	-3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between KWE3.L and FLXC.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021	0.91

The correlation between KWE3.L and FLXC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KWE3.L	FLXC.L
Communication Services	41.5%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	37.1%	5.9%
Healthcare	6.1%	3.2%
Real Estate	5.1%	0.2%
Technology	4.0%	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	1.1%
Financial Services	2.2%	56.7%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Energy	-	2.7%
Industrials	-	14.3%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWE3.L

KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 3
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FLXC.L

FLXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FLXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FLXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KWE3.L	FLXC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	0.01	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	0.14	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.02	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	0.00	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	0.01	-1.24

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the FLXC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWE3.L and FLXC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWE3.L drawdown since its inception was -99.29%, which is greater than FLXC.L's maximum drawdown of -61.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWE3.L and FLXC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KWE3.L	FLXC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.29%	-61.74%	-37.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.64%	-21.43%	-64.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.36%	-25.43%	-62.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.95%	-35.12%	-63.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.04%	-31.72%	-60.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.38%	9.74%	+42.64%

Volatility

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a higher volatility of 24.10% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) at 5.29%. This indicates that KWE3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KWE3.L	FLXC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.10%	5.29%	+18.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.99%	13.77%	+50.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.22%	19.09%	+63.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	134.82%	28.40%	+106.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	134.82%	27.19%	+107.63%

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWE3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

KWE3.L vs. FLXC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KWE3.L nor FLXC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KWE3.L and FLXC.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, KWE3.L and FLXC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, KWE3.L or FLXC.L?

On fees, FLXC.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KWE3.L or FLXC.L?

FLXC.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWE3.L.

What is the main difference between KWE3.L and FLXC.L?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KWE3.L and 0.19% for FLXC.L.