FLXC.L vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
FLXC.L and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXC.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both FLXC.L and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -7.21% | 32.15% | 19.36% | -12.74% | -22.72% | -20.67% | 31.22% | 16.03% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -6.24% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 10.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.L achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -6.24% return.
FLXC.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- -5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -12.30%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLXC.L vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.L
FXI
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.L | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 0.11 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.04 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.15 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 0.46 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.L | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.11 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | -0.10 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.17 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.L and FXI is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
FLXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.58% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Drawdowns
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.L drawdown since its inception was -67.90%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.L and FXI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.L | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.90% | -72.68% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -17.25% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.78% | -55.14% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.31% | -26.17% | -8.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -31.27% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 5.85% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FLXC.L vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) is 6.60%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that FLXC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.L | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 7.06% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 14.69% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.63% | 24.27% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 31.64% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 27.70% | +3.14% |