PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KWE3.L vs. COII.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KWE3.L is traded in USD, while COII.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the COII.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWE3.L achieves a -57.87% return, which is significantly lower than COII.L's -44.69% return.


KWE3.L

1D
-1.12%
1M
-18.01%
YTD
-57.87%
6M
-62.55%
1Y
-59.44%
3Y*
-34.38%
5Y*
10Y*

COII.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
-13.21%
YTD
-44.69%
6M
-51.80%
1Y
-66.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
-57.87%11.50%-36.17%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.69%-43.29%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between KWE3.L and COII.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KWE3.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWE3.L
KWE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KWE3.LCOII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.77

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.88

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-1.35

+0.01

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWE3.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is higher than the COII.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWE3.L and COII.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KWE3.LCOII.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

-1.09

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

-0.80

+0.35

Drawdowns

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWE3.L drawdown since its inception was -98.72%, which is greater than COII.L's maximum drawdown of -74.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWE3.L and COII.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KWE3.LCOII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.72%

-74.62%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.09%

-74.59%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.63%

-73.67%

-24.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.36%

-32.36%

-58.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.53%

49.05%

-4.52%

Volatility

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities (KWE3.L) has a higher volatility of 36.15% compared to IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) at 15.82%. This indicates that KWE3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COII.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KWE3.LCOII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.15%

15.82%

+20.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.19%

42.22%

+18.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.73%

60.71%

+20.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.42%

59.29%

+77.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.42%

59.29%

+77.13%

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWE3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COII.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

KWE3.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison

KWE3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
105.73%191.72%18.99%
KWE3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long China Tech ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KWE3.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KWE3.L.

KWE3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KWE3.L and 0.55% for COII.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KWE3.L and COII.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer