PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L).

KWBP.L and XSTC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWBP.L is a passively managed fund by Waystone Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 1, 2020. XSTC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. Both KWBP.L and XSTC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KWBP.L
KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP		-17.08%16.32%15.36%-14.43%-7.71%-48.70%8.23%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D		-7.50%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%33.47%5.02%
Different Trading Currencies

KWBP.L is traded in GBP, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWBP.L achieves a -17.08% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's -7.50% return.

KWBP.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-17.08%
6M
-30.02%
1Y
-16.87%
3Y*
-1.78%
5Y*
-14.64%
10Y*
—

XSTC.L

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP

Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with KWBP.L:
KWBP.L vs. KWBE.LKWBP.L vs. ESIT.LKWBP.L vs. KARP.LKWBP.L vs. HNSS.LKWBP.L vs. KWEB.LKWBP.L vs. ECOG.LKWBP.L vs. GXLK.L
Often compared with XSTC.L:
XSTC.L vs. BRK-BXSTC.L vs. IITU.LXSTC.L vs. XDWT.LXSTC.L vs. VGTXSTC.L vs. FLXD.LXSTC.L vs. IJPH.LXSTC.L vs. BCHS.L

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWBP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

KWBP.L
KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KWBP.L
KWBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KWBP.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

1.07

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.77

1.59

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.21

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

1.99

-2.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

5.29

-6.48

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWBP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWBP.L and XSTC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KWBP.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

1.07

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.79

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.96

-1.24

Correlation

The correlation between KWBP.L and XSTC.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

KWBP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
KWBP.L
KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D		0.34%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Drawdowns

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWBP.L drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWBP.L and XSTC.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

KWBP.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-29.30%

-47.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.02%

-17.49%

-12.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.68%

-29.30%

-40.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.32%

-13.90%

-51.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.02%

-6.37%

-49.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.03%

6.58%

+5.45%

Volatility

KWBP.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 5.02%. This indicates that KWBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

KWBP.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

5.02%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

14.95%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

23.67%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.52%

22.12%

+22.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.78%

22.41%

+21.37%