PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KWBP.L vs. KARP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KWBP.L
KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP
-17.08%16.32%15.36%-14.43%-1.22%
KARP.L
KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD
5.37%33.35%-17.39%-12.26%-21.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWBP.L achieves a -17.08% return, which is significantly lower than KARP.L's 5.37% return.


KWBP.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-17.08%
6M
-30.02%
1Y
-16.87%
3Y*
-1.78%
5Y*
-14.64%
10Y*

KARP.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.74%
YTD
5.37%
6M
1.99%
1Y
46.41%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWBP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KARP.L's 0.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWBP.L
KWBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KARP.L
KARP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
KARP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
KARP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KWBP.LKARP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

1.87

-2.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.77

2.41

-3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.32

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

5.43

-5.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.19

13.86

-15.05

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWBP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the KARP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWBP.L and KARP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KWBP.LKARP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

1.87

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

-0.24

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between KWBP.L and KARP.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KWBP.L nor KARP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWBP.L drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than KARP.L's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWBP.L and KARP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KWBP.LKARP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-56.63%

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.02%

-9.76%

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.32%

-26.64%

-38.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.02%

-35.48%

-20.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.03%

3.82%

+8.21%

Volatility

KWBP.L vs. KARP.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles & Future Mobility ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (KARP.L) at 6.02%. This indicates that KWBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KWBP.LKARP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

6.02%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

17.10%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

24.66%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.52%

24.96%

+19.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.78%

24.96%

+18.82%