KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L).
KWBP.L and ECOG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWBP.L is a passively managed fund by Waystone Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 1, 2020. ECOG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jan 18, 2018. Both KWBP.L and ECOG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWBP.L KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP | -17.08% | 16.32% | 15.36% | -14.43% | -7.71% | -48.70% | 8.23% |
ECOG.L Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | -5.68% | 3.54% | 4.57% | 15.08% | -12.19% | 19.87% | 6.90% |
Different Trading Currencies
KWBP.L is traded in GBP, while ECOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ECOG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWBP.L achieves a -17.08% return, which is significantly lower than ECOG.L's -5.68% return.
KWBP.L
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -17.08%
- 6M
- -30.02%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.78%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOG.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -5.86%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWBP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ECOG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L — Risk / Return Rank
KWBP.L
ECOG.L
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) and Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KWBP.L | ECOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 0.11 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 0.27 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.60 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 1.98 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KWBP.L | ECOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 0.11 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.15 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.44 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between KWBP.L and ECOG.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KWBP.L nor ECOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWBP.L drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than ECOG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWBP.L and ECOG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWBP.L | ECOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.46% | -26.12% | -50.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -12.80% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.68% | -26.12% | -43.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.32% | -9.09% | -56.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.02% | -7.66% | -48.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.03% | 3.87% | +8.16% |
Volatility
KWBP.L vs. ECOG.L - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet UCITS ETF GBP (KWBP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Legal & General UCITS ETF plc - L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ECOG.L) at 5.55%. This indicates that KWBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KWBP.L | ECOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 5.55% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 11.72% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.82% | 17.45% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.52% | 16.50% | +28.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.78% | 17.09% | +26.69% |