KVLE vs. LVDS
KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. KVLE is passively managed, while LVDS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.
Performance
KVLE vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 13.56% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 10.22% | 3.79% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and LVDS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.81 |
KVLE vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KVLE
LVDS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
KVLE
LVDS
Industrials
KVLE
LVDS
Financial Services
KVLE
LVDS
Real Estate
KVLE
LVDS
Healthcare
KVLE
LVDS
Consumer Cyclical
KVLE
LVDS
Consumer Defensive
KVLE
LVDS
Energy
KVLE
LVDS
Communication Services
KVLE
LVDS
Basic Materials
KVLE
LVDS
Utilities
KVLE
LVDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
LVDS
KVLE vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KVLE | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KVLE | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 2.39 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and LVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -6.64% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -0.98% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility
KVLE vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 10.43% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 10.43% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 10.43% | +3.90% |
KVLE vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
KVLE vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, less than LVDS's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.30% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KVLE and LVDS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 7.30% for KVLE.
They also come from different issuers: CICC and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.30% for LVDS.
Find the right allocation for KVLE and LVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer