KUYAF vs. AEM.TO
KUYAF (Kuya Silver Corp) and AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — KUYAF in Silver, AEM.TO in Gold. Over the past 5 years, KUYAF returned -17.75%/yr vs 23.54%/yr for AEM.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KUYAF is traded in USD, while AEM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AEM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KUYAF achieves a -19.74% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 5.82% return.
KUYAF
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- YTD
- -19.74%
- 6M
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- 188.95%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- -17.75%
- 10Y*
- —
AEM.TO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 45.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KUYAF Kuya Silver Corp | -19.74% | 342.19% | -5.85% | -34.67% | -58.80% | -68.55% | 173.18% | -70.58% | -0.69% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 5.82% | 119.66% | 46.01% | 9.09% | 0.94% | -22.31% | 15.99% | 54.08% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KUYAF and AEM.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, KUYAF and AEM.TO have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KUYAF:
$116.81M
AEM.TO:
CA$124.30B
KUYAF:
-$0.02
AEM.TO:
CA$10.65
KUYAF:
25.56
AEM.TO:
9.18
KUYAF:
2.33
AEM.TO:
4.73
KUYAF:
$3.69M
AEM.TO:
CA$13.56B
KUYAF:
-$36.90K
AEM.TO:
CA$8.26B
KUYAF:
-$3.56M
AEM.TO:
CA$9.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KUYAF
AEM.TO
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kuya Silver Corp (KUYAF) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KUYAF | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 1.05 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.55 | 1.49 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.20 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 1.71 | +3.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 4.29 | +7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KUYAF | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.05 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.64 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.24 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KUYAF drawdown since its inception was -96.76%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -73.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KUYAF and AEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KUYAF | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.76% | -73.75% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.31% | -31.20% | -11.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.03% | -31.20% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.81% | -46.26% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.50% | -28.93% | -57.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.70% | -35.35% | -45.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.22% | 12.41% | +5.81% |
Volatility
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Kuya Silver Corp (KUYAF) has a higher volatility of 26.11% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 14.27%. This indicates that KUYAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KUYAF | AEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.11% | 14.27% | +11.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 73.78% | 34.77% | +39.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.27% | 43.66% | +52.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.18% | 36.96% | +52.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.26% | 37.43% | +77.83% |
Dividends
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
KUYAF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.95% | 2.99% | 2.96% | 3.13% | 1.41% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 1.13% |
KUYAF Kuya Silver Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kuya Silver Corp and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KUYAF vs. AEM.TO - Profitability Comparison
KUYAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported a gross profit of -432.43K and revenue of 1.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -29.9%.
AEM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
KUYAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported an operating income of -1.39M and revenue of 1.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -96.4%.
AEM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
KUYAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kuya Silver Corp reported a net income of -1.22M and revenue of 1.44M, resulting in a net margin of -84.5%.
AEM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KUYAF and AEM.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KUYAF and AEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer