PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTUP vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTUP vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTUP achieves a -70.54% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 1.66% return.


KTUP

1D
-1.16%
1M
-23.79%
YTD
-70.54%
6M
-74.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
-8.30%
1M
-15.70%
YTD
1.66%
6M
-1.47%
1Y
51.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTUP vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KTUP and NVDG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTUP vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTUP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTUP vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KTUPNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

KTUP vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KTUP vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTUP drawdown since its inception was -89.57%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTUP and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTUPNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.57%

-66.19%

-23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.57%

-30.20%

-59.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.18%

-23.05%

-30.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.59%

Volatility

KTUP vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTUPNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

152.80%

70.20%

+82.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.80%

90.59%

+62.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.80%

90.59%

+62.21%

KTUP vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTUP vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

KTUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, less than NVDG's 11.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KTUP and NVDG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for KTUP.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 7.23% for KTUP.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for KTUP and 0.75% for NVDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTUP and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer