PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTUP vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTUP vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KTUP

1D
-1.16%
1M
-23.79%
YTD
-70.54%
6M
-74.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTUP vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KTUP and MUU is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

-0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTUP vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KTUP vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KTUP vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTUP drawdown since its inception was -89.57%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTUP and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTUPMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.57%

-26.28%

-63.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.57%

-26.28%

-63.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.18%

-10.19%

-42.99%

Volatility

KTUP vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTUPMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

152.80%

295.32%

-142.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.80%

295.32%

-142.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

152.80%

295.32%

-142.52%

KTUP vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTUP vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

KTUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KTUP and MUU have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for KTUP.

KTUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for KTUP and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTUP and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer