PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTRAX vs. GBFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Income Builder Fund (KTRAX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTRAX achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than GBFFX's 12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KTRAX has outperformed GBFFX with an annualized return of 7.89%, while GBFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


KTRAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.51%
YTD
9.15%
6M
10.13%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
7.89%

GBFFX

1D
0.04%
1M
2.81%
YTD
12.16%
6M
14.23%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KTRAX
DWS Global Income Builder Fund
9.15%14.66%8.95%14.73%-15.38%10.58%8.06%19.87%-8.04%16.33%
GBFFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Fund
12.16%24.07%0.40%15.24%-3.36%4.38%-3.35%13.79%-7.12%17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between KTRAX and GBFFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015

0.76

The correlation between KTRAX and GBFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTRAX vs. GBFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTRAX
KTRAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
KTRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KTRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GBFFX
GBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Income Builder Fund (KTRAX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTRAXGBFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.86

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

5.24

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

20.15

-8.20

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the GBFFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTRAX and GBFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTRAXGBFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

4.25

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.00

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.70

-0.15

Drawdowns

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTRAX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, which is greater than GBFFX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTRAX and GBFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTRAXGBFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.90%

-26.62%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-5.67%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.73%

-10.18%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-15.91%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

-26.62%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-4.37%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.47%

+0.29%

Volatility

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Global Income Builder Fund (KTRAX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) at 2.28%. This indicates that KTRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTRAXGBFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.28%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

5.38%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

6.99%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

8.07%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

9.08%

+1.10%

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTRAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GBFFX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTRAX vs. GBFFX - Dividend Comparison

KTRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, more than GBFFX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBFFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Fund
4.56%5.11%1.81%5.72%5.48%4.60%3.32%4.00%3.92%2.90%2.72%6.67%
KTRAX
DWS Global Income Builder Fund
8.77%8.76%16.91%2.82%2.69%10.12%2.43%3.22%5.15%10.02%2.75%4.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTRAX and GBFFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KTRAX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to GBFFX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTRAX dropped -39.90% vs GBFFX's -26.62%.

GBFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTRAX and GBFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer