PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTF vs. NZF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTF vs. NZF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTF achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than NZF's 4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, KTF has underperformed NZF with an annualized return of 1.09%, while NZF has yielded a comparatively higher 3.65% annualized return.


KTF

1D
0.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
4.56%
6M
5.60%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.09%

NZF

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.08%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.92%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
3.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTF vs. NZF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KTF
DWS Municipal Income Trust
4.56%4.64%13.80%7.09%-23.94%6.00%7.46%15.31%-8.25%-3.81%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
4.26%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between KTF and NZF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2001

0.44

The correlation between KTF and NZF shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTF vs. NZF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTF
KTF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
KTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTF vs. NZF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KTFNZFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.97

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.41

8.09

+2.31

KTF vs. NZF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the NZF Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTF and NZF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KTF vs. NZF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTF drawdown since its inception was -47.01%, roughly equal to the maximum NZF drawdown of -48.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTF and NZF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTFNZFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.01%

-48.55%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.96%

-8.11%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.44%

-15.59%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.40%

-37.42%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.40%

-37.42%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.96%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-7.77%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.97%

-0.61%

Volatility

KTF vs. NZF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF) is 1.70%, while Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that KTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTFNZFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.64%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.71%

8.33%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.54%

10.51%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

12.40%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.01%

13.12%

-1.11%

Dividends

KTF vs. NZF - Dividend Comparison

KTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than NZF's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KTF
DWS Municipal Income Trust
7.66%8.42%6.94%3.51%4.76%4.25%4.36%4.67%6.17%6.44%6.48%6.23%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.55%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTF and NZF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NZF has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to KTF (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTF dropped -47.01% vs NZF's -48.55%.

KTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTF and NZF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer