KTEC vs. SELV
KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while SELV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by SEI. KTEC is passively managed, while SELV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KTEC returned 0.64%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for SELV. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SELV.
Performance
KTEC vs. SELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -12.58% return, which is significantly lower than SELV's 6.90% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -12.58%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.64%
- 5Y*
- -7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.38%
SELV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $941.66K | $1.10M | $1.04M | |
| $608.47K | $511.20K | $528.68K |
KTEC vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -12.58% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | 0.91% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 6.90% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and SELV is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.24 |
The correlation between KTEC and SELV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KTEC vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KTEC
SELV
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
KTEC
SELV
Communication Services
KTEC
SELV
Technology
KTEC
SELV
Industrials
KTEC
SELV
Healthcare
KTEC
SELV
Basic Materials
KTEC
-
SELV
Consumer Defensive
KTEC
-
SELV
Energy
KTEC
-
SELV
Financial Services
KTEC
-
SELV
Real Estate
KTEC
-
SELV
Utilities
KTEC
-
SELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
SELV
KTEC vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KTEC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.25 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.33 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 6.25 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and SELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -13.73% | -53.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.49% | -5.92% | -30.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.49% | -8.94% | -27.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.83% | -0.91% | -43.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.05% | -2.35% | -41.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.47% | 2.21% | +18.26% |
Volatility
KTEC vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) at 4.54%. This indicates that KTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | SELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 4.54% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 8.02% | +12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.20% | 9.86% | +18.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.63% | 11.98% | +30.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.75% | 11.98% | +30.77% |
KTEC vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
KTEC vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than SELV's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.84% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.67% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KTEC and SELV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KTEC has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to SELV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs SELV's -13.73%.
On 3-year performance, SELV leads with 12.11% vs 0.64% for KTEC. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SELV has performed better with a 12.11% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.67% for SELV.
KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while SELV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.15% for SELV.
SELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KTEC and SELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer