KTEC vs. KOID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KTEC returned -19.03% vs 61.07% for KOID. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

KTEC vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -21.33% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 26.38% return.

KTEC

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -7.85%
• YTD: -21.33%
• 6M: -21.98%
• 1Y: -19.03%
• 3Y*: 3.17%
• 5Y*: -12.60%
• 10Y*: —

KOID

• 1D: -5.61%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: 26.38%
• 6M: 29.73%
• 1Y: 61.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-21.33%	1.43%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	26.38%	27.04%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and KOID is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.64

The correlation between KTEC and KOID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

KTEC vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KTEC	KOID
Consumer Cyclical	45.1%	14.7%
Communication Services	28.2%	-
Technology	24.5%	43.1%
Healthcare	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	37.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KTEC vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 4
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 71
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KTEC	KOID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	2.35	-3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	3.01	-3.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.38	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	3.37	-3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	11.20	-12.28

KTEC vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the KOID Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and KOID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and KOID.

Drawdown Indicators

	KTEC	KOID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.90%	-18.19%	-48.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.76%	-18.19%	-16.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.35%	-6.96%	-43.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-3.41%	-40.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.67%	5.47%	+12.20%

Volatility

KTEC vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is 8.17%, while KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that KTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KTEC	KOID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	11.66%	-3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	21.06%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.88%	26.15%	+1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.21%	25.84%	+17.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.05%	25.84%	+17.21%

KTEC vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KTEC and KOID have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

KTEC vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than KOID's 0.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.67%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.26%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KTEC and KOID in my portfolio?

KTEC and KOID have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KTEC or KOID?

KOID has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to KTEC (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs KOID's -18.19%.

Which ETF is better, KTEC or KOID?

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 61.07% vs -19.03% for KTEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 8.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KTEC or KOID?

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 61.07% return vs -19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KTEC or KOID?

KTEC and KOID have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KTEC or KOID?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.67% for KOID.

What is the main difference between KTEC and KOID?

KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while KOID is Technology Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while KOID tracks MerQube Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.