KSTR vs. 1691.HK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK).

KSTR is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2021.

Performance

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	-0.27%	42.82%	6.12%	-17.93%	-38.51%	-1.70%
1691.HK Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd	-7.36%	38.61%	-9.87%	-81.54%	-32.87%	-29.61%

Different Trading Currencies

KSTR is traded in USD, while 1691.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1691.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than 1691.HK's -7.36% return.

KSTR

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -10.47%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: -7.57%
• 1Y: 33.72%
• 3Y*: 3.01%
• 5Y*: -2.81%
• 10Y*: —

1691.HK

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: -7.36%
• 6M: -3.87%
• 1Y: -5.41%
• 3Y*: -38.41%
• 5Y*: -40.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KSTR vs. 1691.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

1691.HK

1691.HK Risk / Return Rank: 34
1691.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
1691.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
1691.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 32
1691.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
1691.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KSTR	1691.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	-0.13	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.11	+1.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.02	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	-0.19	+2.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	-0.32	+5.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the 1691.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR and 1691.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KSTR	1691.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	-0.13	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	-0.63	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	-0.23	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR and 1691.HK is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR nor 1691.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
1691.HK Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.06%	0.80%	0.35%	0.65%

Drawdowns

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, smaller than the maximum 1691.HK drawdown of -95.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and 1691.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSTR	1691.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.46%	-95.91%	+29.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-25.88%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.46%	-95.91%	+29.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.21%	-92.65%	+59.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.46%	-61.74%	+22.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.68%	15.67%	-8.99%

Volatility

KSTR vs. 1691.HK - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK) have volatilities of 8.94% and 8.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KSTR	1691.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	8.68%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.35%	18.89%	+3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.52%	42.51%	-9.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.45%	65.90%	-28.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.24%	67.94%	-30.70%