PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares ICBCCS SSE STAR Market 50 Index UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KSTR.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR.L achieves a 33.13% return, which is significantly higher than XCHA.L's 4.03% return.


KSTR.L

1D
-5.63%
1M
-7.01%
6M
17.12%
YTD
33.13%
1Y
79.93%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*

XCHA.L

1D
-3.22%
1M
-7.31%
6M
1.59%
YTD
4.03%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE STAR Market 50 Index UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
33.13%42.76%5.23%-18.80%-38.16%2.78%
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
4.03%30.11%16.00%-11.00%-24.25%-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR.L and XCHA.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.72

The correlation between KSTR.L and XCHA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR.L
KSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHA.L
XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS SSE STAR Market 50 Index UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KSTR.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSTR.LXCHA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.57

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

9.60

+0.70

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR.L and XCHA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR.L drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, which is greater than XCHA.L's maximum drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR.L and XCHA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSTR.LXCHA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.67%

-50.90%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.57%

-9.93%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.82%

-26.85%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.38%

-39.75%

-26.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.57%

-9.93%

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-23.99%

-15.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

2.66%

+5.07%

Volatility

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares ICBCCS SSE STAR Market 50 Index UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KSTR.L) has a higher volatility of 19.71% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) at 9.31%. This indicates that KSTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSTR.LXCHA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.71%

9.31%

+10.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.05%

14.86%

+19.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.03%

19.24%

+21.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.61%

22.67%

+11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

22.80%

+11.75%

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR.L has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSTR.L vs. XCHA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR.L nor XCHA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KSTR.L and XCHA.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCHA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCHA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for KSTR.L.

KSTR.L tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while XCHA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for KSTR.L and 0.50% for XCHA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSTR.L and XCHA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer