PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR.L achieves a 41.53% return, which is significantly higher than WNRG.L's 25.26% return.


KSTR.L

1D
-4.62%
1M
3.52%
6M
25.64%
YTD
41.53%
1Y
93.56%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*

WNRG.L

1D
0.34%
1M
1.22%
6M
19.05%
YTD
25.26%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
20.08%
10Y*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KSTR.L
KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF
41.53%42.76%5.23%-18.80%-38.16%2.78%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF
25.26%14.83%2.07%3.52%46.61%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR.L and WNRG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.09

The correlation between KSTR.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR.L
KSTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KSTR.LWNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

2.14

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.21

6.18

+6.03

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR.L drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, roughly equal to the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR.L and WNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSTR.LWNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.67%

-68.72%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-15.98%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.60%

-18.94%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.38%

-26.55%

-39.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-9.97%

-8.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-17.54%

-22.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

5.55%

+2.03%

Volatility

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a higher volatility of 19.20% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L) at 6.79%. This indicates that KSTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSTR.LWNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.20%

6.79%

+12.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.48%

17.77%

+15.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.57%

20.58%

+19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.52%

24.34%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.46%

33.35%

+1.11%

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR.L has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSTR.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR.L nor WNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KSTR.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for KSTR.L.

KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF, while WNRG.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for KSTR.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSTR.L and WNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer