KSLV vs. SIL
KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both Silver funds. KSLV is actively managed, while SIL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KSLV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
KSLV vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSLV achieves a -18.01% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -8.46% return.
KSLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- 6M
- -27.58%
- YTD
- -18.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -14.83%
- YTD
- -8.46%
- 1Y
- 52.00%
- 3Y*
- 45.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
KSLV vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | -18.01% | 49.94% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -8.46% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSLV and SIL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSLV vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
KSLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIL
KSLV vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSLV | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSLV vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSLV drawdown since its inception was -53.51%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSLV and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSLV | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.51% | -82.99% | +29.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.41% | -35.22% | -16.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -51.32% | +28.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.40% | — |
Volatility
KSLV vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSLV | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.51% | 52.86% | +17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 39.97% | +30.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 39.82% | +30.69% |
KSLV vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSLV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSLV vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.17%, more than SIL's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 23.17% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.33% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSLV and SIL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 23.17%, compared with 1.33% for SIL.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KSLV and 0.65% for SIL.
Find the right allocation for KSLV and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer