KSLV vs. GLDM
KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - KSLV is a Silver fund actively managed by Kurv, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. KSLV is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KSLV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
KSLV vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSLV achieves a -18.01% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -4.78% return.
KSLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- 6M
- -27.58%
- YTD
- -18.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- 22.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- —
KSLV vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | -18.01% | 49.94% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -4.78% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSLV and GLDM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSLV vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
KSLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLDM
KSLV vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSLV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSLV vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSLV drawdown since its inception was -53.51%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSLV and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSLV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.51% | -26.11% | -27.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.41% | -23.86% | -27.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -6.42% | -16.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility
KSLV vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSLV | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.51% | 27.58% | +42.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 18.25% | +52.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 17.05% | +53.46% |
KSLV vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSLV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSLV vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.17%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 23.17% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSLV and GLDM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 23.17%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
KSLV is categorized as Silver, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KSLV and 0.10% for GLDM.
Find the right allocation for KSLV and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer