PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSEP vs. PMJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSEP vs. PMJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSEP achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly higher than PMJA's 2.35% return.


KSEP

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.76%
YTD
8.77%
6M
8.72%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMJA

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.35%
6M
2.84%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSEP vs. PMJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KSEP and PMJA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.74

The correlation between KSEP and PMJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSEP vs. PMJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSEP
KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PMJA
PMJA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PMJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMJA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PMJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMJA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSEP vs. PMJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSEPPMJADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.88

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

5.32

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.77

26.64

-10.87

KSEP vs. PMJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the PMJA Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSEP and PMJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSEPPMJADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

3.80

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

2.32

-1.29

Drawdowns

KSEP vs. PMJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSEP drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, which is greater than PMJA's maximum drawdown of -2.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSEP and PMJA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSEPPMJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-2.98%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-1.45%

-3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.04%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-0.34%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

0.29%

+1.02%

Volatility

KSEP vs. PMJA - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA) at 0.33%. This indicates that KSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSEPPMJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

0.33%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

1.49%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

2.04%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

2.85%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

2.85%

+8.80%

KSEP vs. PMJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMJA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSEP vs. PMJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSEP nor PMJA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KSEP and PMJA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSEP has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to PMJA (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSEP dropped -14.92% vs PMJA's -2.98%.

On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 20.63% vs 7.69% for PMJA. On fees, PMJA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMJA has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 20.63% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMJA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KSEP.

KSEP and PMJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KSEP and 0.50% for PMJA.

PMJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSEP and PMJA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer