KSEP vs. KAPR
KSEP (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. KSEP is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, KSEP returned 20.63% vs 22.85% for KAPR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
KSEP vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSEP achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 10.96% return.
KSEP
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAPR
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- —
KSEP vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KSEP Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September | 8.77% | 8.54% | 3.08% |
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 10.96% | 7.42% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSEP and KAPR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.91 |
The correlation between KSEP and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSEP vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank
KSEP
KAPR
KSEP vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KSEP | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.74 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 9.12 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.77 | 43.03 | -27.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KSEP | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 3.53 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.83 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
KSEP vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSEP drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSEP and KAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSEP | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.92% | -16.91% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.75% | -2.52% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.52% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -3.92% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 0.53% | +0.78% |
Volatility
KSEP vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) is 1.63%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that KSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSEP | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 2.30% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 4.06% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 6.54% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 11.75% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 11.63% | +0.02% |
KSEP vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KSEP and KAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
KSEP vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither KSEP nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KSEP and KAPR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KAPR has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to KSEP (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSEP dropped -14.92% vs KAPR's -16.91%.
On 1-year performance, KAPR leads with 22.85% vs 20.63% for KSEP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KAPR has performed better with a 22.85% return vs 20.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KSEP and KAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
KSEP and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KSEP and KAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer