KRWL.L vs. XMID.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KRWL.L (Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc) and XMID.L (Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - KRWL.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while XMID.L tracks the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRWL.L returned 19.95%/yr vs -9.05%/yr for XMID.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KRWL.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XMID.L.

Performance

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRWL.L achieves a 106.66% return, which is significantly higher than XMID.L's -39.40% return.

KRWL.L

• 1D: -4.89%
• 1M: 11.73%
• YTD: 106.66%
• 6M: 119.98%
• 1Y: 227.67%
• 3Y*: 45.48%
• 5Y*: 19.95%
• 10Y*: —

XMID.L

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -19.45%
• YTD: -39.40%
• 6M: -40.46%
• 1Y: -39.69%
• 3Y*: -23.13%
• 5Y*: -9.05%
• 10Y*: -3.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KRWL.L Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc	106.66%	86.86%	-21.27%	13.04%	-19.64%	-7.54%	38.43%	7.15%	-12.12%
XMID.L Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-39.40%	-8.44%	-12.66%	-0.27%	14.84%	1.39%	-10.64%	3.73%	-4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KRWL.L and XMID.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between KRWL.L and XMID.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRWL.L	XMID.L
Technology	42.8%	3.3%
Healthcare	12.8%	-
Communication Services	11.7%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	3.7%
Industrials	4.1%	8.3%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Financial Services	1.8%	51.0%
Energy	1.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	0.4%	17.2%

Return for Risk

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRWL.L

KRWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
KRWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
KRWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KRWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KRWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
KRWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

XMID.L

XMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 0
XMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
XMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRWL.L	XMID.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.22	-1.59	+7.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.50	-2.39	+7.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	0.71	+1.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.93	-0.92	+11.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.59	-2.56	+41.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRWL.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.22, which is higher than the XMID.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRWL.L and XMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRWL.L	XMID.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.22	-1.59	+7.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	-0.45	+1.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	-0.12	+0.73

Drawdowns

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRWL.L drawdown since its inception was -44.10%, smaller than the maximum XMID.L drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRWL.L and XMID.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRWL.L	XMID.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.10%	-58.27%	+14.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.55%	-42.58%	+21.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.42%	-53.97%	+25.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.54%	-58.27%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.36%	-58.27%	+52.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.40%	-17.97%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.11%	15.24%	-9.13%

Volatility

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Korea UCITS ETF - Acc (KRWL.L) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) at 6.26%. This indicates that KRWL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRWL.L	XMID.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.51%	6.26%	+11.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.27%	19.74%	+12.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.87%	24.49%	+13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.51%	20.06%	+5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.79%	23.32%	+2.47%

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XMID.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRWL.L vs. XMID.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KRWL.L nor XMID.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRWL.L and XMID.L in my portfolio?

KRWL.L and XMID.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KRWL.L or XMID.L?

On fees, KRWL.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRWL.L or XMID.L?

KRWL.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMID.L.

What is the main difference between KRWL.L and XMID.L?

KRWL.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while XMID.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for KRWL.L and 0.65% for XMID.L.