KRT vs. NTR
KRT (Karat Packaging Inc.) and NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) are both stocks. KRT operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, KRT returned 13.78%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for NTR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KRT vs. NTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRT achieves a 37.80% return, which is significantly higher than NTR's 10.35% return.
KRT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 37.80%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 27.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
NTR
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
KRT vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRT Karat Packaging Inc. | 37.80% | -20.12% | 28.81% | 86.11% | -27.07% | 8.66% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 10.35% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 35.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRT and NTR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.16 |
The correlation between KRT and NTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KRT:
$603.41M
NTR:
$32.57B
KRT:
$1.58
NTR:
$4.93
KRT:
19.04
NTR:
13.72
KRT:
1.95
NTR:
0.20
KRT:
1.26
NTR:
1.18
KRT:
3.89
NTR:
1.29
KRT:
$481.07M
NTR:
$27.76B
KRT:
$172.90M
NTR:
$8.66B
KRT:
$56.33M
NTR:
$6.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRT vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank
KRT
NTR
KRT vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRT | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.72 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 1.87 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRT vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRT drawdown since its inception was -48.46%, smaller than the maximum NTR drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRT and NTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRT | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.46% | -57.80% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.80% | -21.97% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.03% | -32.82% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.46% | -57.80% | +9.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -31.34% | +30.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -26.17% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.84% | 8.49% | +4.35% |
Volatility
KRT vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison
Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 6.45%. This indicates that KRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRT | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 6.45% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.08% | 25.79% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.86% | 31.82% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.39% | 34.21% | +11.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.43% | 33.99% | +11.44% |
Dividends
KRT vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison
KRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than NTR's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRT Karat Packaging Inc. | 5.99% | 7.98% | 5.12% | 6.24% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.23% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% |
Financials
KRT vs. NTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Karat Packaging Inc. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KRT vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison
KRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.53M and revenue of 116.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
KRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported an operating income of 8.46M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
KRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Karat Packaging Inc. reported a net income of 6.74M and revenue of 116.95M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KRT and NTR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRT has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to NTR (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRT dropped -48.46% vs NTR's -57.80%.
KRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRT and NTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer